What shall we make of this?
And what can we learn from it?
Leave your thoughts in the comments below and then come back next week for the reveal!
Stay connected
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Comments
Does it have to do with the misplaced sort (“that” becomes “thnt”) in the running title on C1v?
Simran Thadani — July 2, 2013
Yes—that’s an excellent error, isn’t it? There’s actually another oddity happening here as well…
Sarah Werner — July 2, 2013
Looks like a quarto, so the right hand leaf – if it really is c2r – should prob be folio 10 rather than folio 12. That it?
Bob MacLean — July 3, 2013
Yes—it really is C2r and it really should be fol. 10, not 12! It’s not as obvious an error as “thnt” and they’re happening for different reasons, but both tell us something about how the book was made.
Sarah Werner — July 3, 2013
Yay! (Proudly polishes his Hist bib spotter’s badge) 🙂
Bob MacLean — July 3, 2013
The first things I noticed were the stab-stitching holes in the gutter, but that’s probably because stab-stitching is my current research obsession.
Aaron T. Pratt — July 5, 2013
That’s actually an excellent point—we see what we’re looking to see!
Sarah Werner — July 6, 2013