is the author used for "crocodile mystery" posts, Q&As with Folger staff, and other general posts. — View all posts by The Collation
Stay connected
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Comments
Is it two colour printing (red first, black second) where the printer has made a mistake correctly registering the paper for the second pass through the press?
While Dove and Swallow are types of birds, this is not the subject of the work (and see the comments above–I accidentally misread your comment and answered it incorrectly!).
I have to confess that it was just googling the two together and seeing that there were two almanac authors by those names at work at the same time at the end of the 17th-century (http://books.google.com/books?id=sgs9AAAAIAAJ&lpg=PA31&ots=on1O_ExPlT&dq=dove%20swallow%20almanack&pg=PA31#v=onepage&q&f=false).
Was it a change in authorship, or just an attempt to correct an error?
So Jordan’s got the general sense of the book right: Dove and Swallow both made almanacs that were printed in Cambridge. (That’s some pretty powerful googling mojo!) The answer of how Swallow came to overprint Dove is a bit complicated to go into here, but next week’s post will explain all!
Comments
Is it two colour printing (red first, black second) where the printer has made a mistake correctly registering the paper for the second pass through the press?
Bob MacLean — December 5, 2013
It is definitely that! (The black is on top of the red so, as you note, it must have been printed second.)
Now for the harder mystery—anyone have any thoughts on what text this might be?
Update: See Deborah’s comment and my response below. This is a mistake and the black is on top of the red, but the problem isn’t the registration…
Sarah Werner — December 5, 2013
A mistake, yes, but not actually a registration mistake …
Deborah J. Leslie — December 5, 2013
Whoops, yes–I’d read Bob’s comment too quickly. It’s not a registration mistake. Thanks for catching that!
Sarah Werner — December 6, 2013
I’d have a guess at something to do with birds/ornithology maybe?
Bob MacLean — December 6, 2013
While Dove and Swallow are types of birds, this is not the subject of the work (and see the comments above–I accidentally misread your comment and answered it incorrectly!).
Sarah Werner — December 6, 2013
Is it an almanac, by any chance?
Jordan — December 6, 2013
It is! Do you want to share what led you to that? And does that lead you–or anyone else–to a theory as to why one has been overprinted with the other?
Sarah Werner — December 6, 2013
I have to confess that it was just googling the two together and seeing that there were two almanac authors by those names at work at the same time at the end of the 17th-century (http://books.google.com/books?id=sgs9AAAAIAAJ&lpg=PA31&ots=on1O_ExPlT&dq=dove%20swallow%20almanack&pg=PA31#v=onepage&q&f=false).
Was it a change in authorship, or just an attempt to correct an error?
Jordan — December 6, 2013
So Jordan’s got the general sense of the book right: Dove and Swallow both made almanacs that were printed in Cambridge. (That’s some pretty powerful googling mojo!) The answer of how Swallow came to overprint Dove is a bit complicated to go into here, but next week’s post will explain all!
Sarah Werner — December 8, 2013
Don’t miss the stirring conclusion to this mystery, “‘Tis the season for almanacs”!
Sarah Werner — December 10, 2013